I love “Lightbulb Moments” – whether it is because one of my
players suddenly “sees the light” or I do, they’re (pardon the pun) quite
illuminating. I had one the other night. I found myself with some spare time –
my significant other was in the midst of watching/catching up on her TV shows,
so I started looking through my COOL Clinic DVD’s. I’ve talked about the COOL Clinic before, but I’ll
say it again – if you are at all involved with the offensive line, you are
cheating yourself and your players if you aren’t taking advantage of this
knowledge.
Anyway, ever since I saw Dave Christensen a couple of weeks
ago talk about how A&M ran the inside zone, I saw that how defenses played
the Aggies really opened up the run game, and that their inside zone really
tended to stretch a defense. Coach also talked about complementing it with the
outside zone, but the technical aspects of the outside zone were out of the
parameters of his talk so he didn’t really get into it. My experience with the
outside zone since the early 2000’s is limited. I guess the last time I
actually installed it was 2013, but then we got away from it in favor of the
Fly Sweep, and that has remained the trend since then. I think a lot of that
has to do with the feeling that I had that my implementation of the outside
zone was stale – I felt like all the other run plays I install (inside zone,
counter, fly, toss, trap) have evolved over time into pretty effective plays,
but by and large, my thinking on the outside zone was stuck in the 1990’s.
So when I looked at my DVD’s the other night, I saw one that
had two presentations – Mark Staten from Michigan State and Rick Trickett from
Florida State, both talking on the outside zone. All righty – let’s see what
they have to say!
Coach Staten’s presentation was phenomenal – mostly because
his scheme and technique is so closely related to what we’re doing on the
inside zone that I think adapting it would be a no-brainer. Basically, the
angle of your first two steps is a little different, and then you’d like
different hand placement depending on if you had help or not, but other than
that, from a schematic standpoint, it fits in extremely well. He’s very heavy
on “pin n’ pull” concepts as are we.
Next up was Coach Trickett’s talk. Coach may have the
deepest Southern accent I’ve ever heard…..only Bob Cope is (was, RIP) in the
same league. His style of the outside zone at first glance was very different –
almost all straight zone, very little of the pin ‘n pull of Michigan
State. But the simplicity of the play
was what drew me to liking his stuff a lot. However, in deciding what to go
with, ultimately I wanted to change the OL thinking less and merely alter the
path of the RB slightly.
Speaking of the path of the RB, that brings me back to Coach
Christensen’s talk a couple weeks ago. He’s got the RB lined up on the inside
leg of that tackle, even with the QB. Even on the inside zone, he’s got the RB
coming across flat, with the QB taking a slight step backwards to clear, and
then the RB plants and cuts it upfield into the B gap (initially – can always
change based on the read). The reason for that is if the back is slightly
behind the QB, on the inside zone he tends to run more downhill. Well, most
people would say that’s a good thing – after all, that was one of the big
selling points on the Pistol formation, getting the RB downhill. Well, that is
great, but remember that that downhill path affects the LB’s too. They see that
RB trajectory and they’ll start flowing downhill in a hurry, causing congestion
where you want to run.
On the other hand, having the RB come across flat, now the
defense doesn’t know whether it is inside zone, or outside zone. If it is
outside, and they don’t react appropriately, they’re going to be outflanked
quickly. If they react to the path thinking it is outside, and it turns out to
be inside, then the OL has them going sideways, and for a defender that is a
great way to get your ass kicked! So now the defense is left guessing – which is
exactly what we want. Regular readers of this blog have heard me say again and
again, “Make the defense play with doubt.” It was true when Homer Smith first
said it sometime in the early 80’s, and it is just as true now.
Suffice to say, my thinking on the outside zone has been
rejuvenated and I’m looking forward to see the results of this particular
Lightbulb Moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment